MYR Home
Home · Calculators · Notes
Notes · English

GDP vs GDI in Malaysia: did the terms of trade add to national income in 2026?

Malaysia's real GDP grew 6.0% in Q2 2026, while a CapsWindow estimate of real gross domestic income, which adds the terms-of-trade gain, grew about 8.1%. The DOSM terms-of-trade index, fuel versus E&E prices, a Korea comparison and why real GNI rose only 2.2%.

CapsWindowPublished:
Economic growthTerms of tradeExportsOil

Malaysia’s economy grew 6.0% in the second quarter of 2026. GDP measures how much is produced, not how much that output can buy. When the prices Malaysia gets for its exports rise faster than the prices it pays for imports, the same output buys more, and national accountants call that difference a trading gain.

What is the difference between GDP and GDI?

Real GDP counts the volume of goods and services produced, valued at fixed 2015 prices in Malaysia’s accounts. Real gross domestic income (GDI) asks a different question: how much can that output buy? The gap between the two is the trading gain or loss from a change in the terms of trade, the ratio of export prices to import prices.

A simple illustration, not data: suppose one shipment of chips used to pay for 100 barrels of crude oil. If chip prices rise 10% and oil prices do not move, the same shipment now pays for 110 barrels. GDP records the same shipment. GDI records the extra 10 barrels of purchasing power.

The Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM) publishes real GDP and real gross national income (GNI), but no GDI line and no trading-gain item. GNI differs from GDP for another reason: it adds income earned abroad by residents and subtracts income paid to non-residents. So this note estimates real GDI from DOSM’s own expenditure tables and keeps the official GNI figures alongside.

How fast did real income grow compared with GDP?

By the CapsWindow estimate, real GDI grew about 8.1% in Q2 2026, two points faster than real GDP.

8.1% vs 6.0%

Real GDI (CapsWindow estimate) versus real GDP, year on year, Q2 2026, from DOSM quarterly national accounts at 2015 prices

The method: export and import price deflators come from DOSM’s quarterly expenditure series at constant 2015 prices and current prices. The trading gain is nominal exports divided by the import deflator, minus real exports. Real GDI is real GDP plus that gain. Using the average of the export and import deflators instead gives 7.9% for Q2 2026. Official real GNI comes from the key macroeconomic data table in DOSM’s Q2 2026 GDP publication.

Visual guide

How fast did real income grow compared with GDP?

Real GDP, YoY

  • Q1 20254.4%
  • Q2 20254.6%
  • Q3 20255.3%
  • Q4 20256.2%
  • Q1 20265.4%
  • Q2 20266.0%

Shared linear scale from zero. Selected entries from the table below. Its dates, units, definitions and limitations still apply.

Sources ↓

QuarterReal GDP, YoYTrading gain, RM bn at 2015 prices (CapsWindow calculation)Real GDI, YoY (CapsWindow estimate)Real GNI, YoY (DOSM)
Q1 20254.4%7.55.3%4.2%
Q2 20254.6%7.15.8%4.8%
Q3 20255.3%8.07.2%4.5%
Q4 20256.2%11.86.9%4.8%
Q1 20265.4%13.06.6%3.6%
Q2 20266.0%16.28.1%2.2%

Estimated GDI grew faster than GDP in each of the six quarters. In Q2 2026 the export deflator was 7.3% higher than a year earlier and the import deflator 4.9% higher (CapsWindow calculation), and the gain reached about 3.6% of real GDP.

How large is the terms-of-trade gain, and where does it show up?

DOSM’s monthly terms-of-trade index (2010=100) also covers Q3, which the national accounts do not yet detail. In September 2026 it stood at 126.8, 2.2% higher than a year earlier, as export unit values rose 8.1% and import unit values 5.8% (DOSM, External Trade Indices, September 2026). In August the index was up 3.6% on the year (DOSM, August 2026).

QuarterTerms-of-trade index, quarterly average (2010=100)YoY
Q4 2025123.6+5.3%
Q1 2026124.6+5.0%
Q2 2026122.0+1.9%
Q3 2026126.8+3.4%

Quarterly averages and changes are CapsWindow calculations from DOSM’s monthly index table; September 2026 is provisional. The dip in Q2 came from April, when the index fell to 119.6 from 124.4 in March as the import unit value for mineral fuels jumped from 121.7 to 186.0. That was shortly after the Middle East conflict escalated at the end of February and pushed oil prices up.

Malaysia is both an oil and gas exporter and an electronics exporter, so it helps to split the index by product group.

SITC sectionExport unit value, Sep 2025 to Sep 2026Import unit value, Sep 2025 to Sep 2026Net exports, Jan to Sep 2026
Mineral fuels (section 3)+27.0%+45.9%+RM4.8 billion
Machinery and transport equipment, including E&E (section 7)+3.6%−1.4%+RM111.0 billion

All four figures are CapsWindow calculations from DOSM’s unit value index tables and monthly trade data. Fuel import prices rose faster than fuel export prices, so oil on its own worked against Malaysia’s terms of trade, but fuel trade is close to balanced (RM161.7 billion of exports against RM157.0 billion of imports in January to September 2026). In machinery and transport equipment, export prices rose while import prices slipped, on a trade base more than five times larger. This is arithmetic on price indices; it does not prove which product caused the gain.

Is Malaysia on the same side as Korea?

Yes, both gained, but Malaysia far less. Korea’s real GDI rose 18.8% in Q3 2026 against real GDP growth of 3.4%, the fastest GDI growth since Q4 1977, and Korea’s trading account swung from a loss of 10.9 trillion won in Q3 2025 to a gain of 77.5 trillion won (Bank of Korea ECOS, table 200Y106).

KoreaMalaysia
Latest quarterQ3 2026Q2 2026
Real GDP, YoY3.4%6.0%
Real GDI, YoY18.8% (official)8.1% (CapsWindow estimate)
GDI minus GDP15.4 pointsabout 2 points

The quarters and methods differ, so treat the comparison as a matter of scale. Malaysia’s GDP grew much faster than Korea’s, but its terms-of-trade gain was a fraction of Korea’s. One visible difference in the data above is that Malaysia’s machinery and electronics export prices rose only 3.6% in the year to September, and its oil and gas exports roughly offset its fuel imports.

Why does the gain not feel like extra income?

Three things in the data point that way.

First, more of the income produced in Malaysia went abroad. Net primary income from abroad was minus RM27.2 billion in Q2 2026, against minus RM9.5 billion in Q2 2025, so real GNI grew only 2.2% while real GDP grew 6.0% (DOSM Q2 2026 publication). This line covers profits and dividends of foreign-owned firms, interest and cross-border wages; DOSM’s release does not say which part grew.

Second, household spending grew more slowly than output. Private consumption rose 4.8% in Q2 2026 against GDP growth of 6.0% (DOSM, Q2 2026). Bank Negara’s September statement noted “limited spillover of external sector strength to wages” (BNM, 3 September 2026).

Third, part of the energy-price gain reaches the government rather than households. The Finance Ministry estimates Petronas’s dividend at RM27 billion for 2026 and RM32 billion for 2027 (Bernama, 9 October 2026).

DOSM does not state how it deflates GNI. A CapsWindow check found that nominal GNI divided by the GDP deflator lands close to the published real GNI (423.6 against 424.7 billion ringgit in Q2 2026), so the official real GNI should not be read as a measure that already includes the terms-of-trade gain.

A national income figure does not show how your own savings have done. If you want to see how a ringgit amount has kept up with prices and money supply over time, the calculator below lets you check it.

Check how your savings kept up →

The GDI figures here are CapsWindow estimates, not DOSM statistics, and they depend on the deflator chosen: the import deflator gives 8.1% for Q2 2026 and the average of the export and import deflators gives 7.9%. National-accounts deflators cover goods and services, while the DOSM terms-of-trade index covers goods only and uses 2010=100, so the two will not match exactly. Q3 2026 GDP growth of 5.3% is an advance estimate without expenditure detail; DOSM will publish the preliminary figures on 18 November 2026, and earlier quarters have been revised before (Q4 2025 went from 5.7% to 6.2%). The September 2026 trade indices are provisional. The Korea figures are for a different quarter and come from an official trading-gain series.

Questions & answers

What is the difference between GDP and GDI?

Real GDP measures the volume of goods and services produced in Malaysia. Real GDI measures what that production can buy: it adds the trading gain or loss that appears when export prices rise faster or slower than import prices. When the terms of trade improve, real GDI grows faster than real GDP. DOSM does not publish GDI, so the 8.1% figure for Q2 2026 is a CapsWindow estimate.

Does Malaysia gain or lose when oil prices rise?

On fuel alone the effect is small and, in the year to September 2026, slightly negative: DOSM's import unit value for mineral fuels rose 45.9% while the export unit value rose 27.0% (CapsWindow calculation). Fuel exports and imports were nearly balanced, at RM161.7 billion and RM157.0 billion in January to September 2026, so the overall terms of trade still improved because total export prices rose faster than total import prices.

Why did real GNI grow less than GDP?

Real GNI subtracts income paid to non-residents. Net primary income from abroad was minus RM27.2 billion in Q2 2026, against minus RM9.5 billion a year earlier, so real GNI rose only 2.2% while real GDP rose 6.0%. DOSM's release does not break the outflow down into profits, dividends, interest or wages.

Source

  1. DOSM - Gross Domestic Product, Second Quarter 2026 ↗
  2. DOSM - GDP Second Quarter 2026 publication (key macroeconomic data, GNI tables) ↗
  3. OpenDOSM - Quarterly GDP by expenditure, constant 2015 prices ↗
  4. OpenDOSM - Quarterly GDP by expenditure, current prices ↗
  5. DOSM - Malaysia External Trade Indices, September 2026 ↗
  6. DOSM - Malaysia External Trade Indices, August 2026 ↗
  7. OpenDOSM - Monthly trade by SITC section (API) ↗
  8. DOSM - Advance GDP Estimates, Third Quarter 2026 (media release) ↗
  9. Bank Negara Malaysia - Monetary Policy Statement, 3 September 2026 ↗
  10. Bernama - Ministry of Finance Economic Outlook 2027, 9 October 2026 ↗
  11. Bank of Korea - Economic Statistics System (ECOS), table 200Y106 ↗

Calculators

Explore more